(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-28 11:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gileonnen.livejournal.com
That is exactly my reaction. ^_^

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-28 11:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rainbowjehan.livejournal.com
Interestingly, nobody would be comfy being just poly. Or, rather, everybody is comfy with an exclusive relationship.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-28 11:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gileonnen.livejournal.com
I'm more the latter, really. I'm comfortable being in an exclusive relationship if my partner wants that, but I'm also comfortable being open.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 06:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyschist.livejournal.com
Actually, the way you phrased the question, I could see people answering that they'd be comfortable poly without actually having tried it (I thought I would be long before I tried it, and I mostly am, but we've had some really rough patches).

I also know quite a few poly folks, my boyfriend included, who would not be comfy with an exclusive relationship (we've done it for periods while working on stuff, but long-term, it's not a possibility for him. I'm not sure it is for me, either). So they're out there.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 01:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rainbowjehan.livejournal.com
Thank you! You're right, I can see where my phrasing would make certain assumptions.

I keep trying to hone this survey, so hopefully next year I will be able to make one that's better, based on feedback like this.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 04:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyschist.livejournal.com
I think it's probably impossible to cover all the possibilities (especially wrt gender) with tickyboxes. But I always find these surveys interesting.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 04:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyschist.livejournal.com
It also occurs to me that there are going to be definition differences--I don't identify as pansexual because I just find the word a bit silly, but I'm not bisexual in the sense that I'm only attracted to people who identify as male or female. Other people might use "bisexual" in a more limited way.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-30 01:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gileonnen.livejournal.com
I see what you're getting at here--I don't like the term 'bisexual' mainly because (as a genderqueer person) I don't like the way that it connotes only two options; however, I recognize that this is an entirely (and unnecessarily?) political statement on my part. For me, pansexuality is an oppositional identity; bisexuals probably mean the same fool thing I do when they self-identify, but they're not the same kind of aggressive about it. ^_~

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-30 05:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyschist.livejournal.com
Hmm. It probably depends on the bisexual person? Some bisexual people are definitely believers in binary gender. But I haven't surveyed what people mean by bisexual. That would be interesting.

I just personally find "pansexual" to be a really weird term that I'm not comfortable using, although I guess it might be more precise. "Multisexual" is worse.

I actually mostly use "queer" to describe myself as a way of getting around all of that. Instead of struggling to be precise, I will be vague! O_O

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-30 11:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gileonnen.livejournal.com
XD I, too, take refuge in vagueness!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-29 09:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rainbowjehan.livejournal.com
Well, yes. But I like to try to get at least a range.

Profile

psalm_onethirtyone: (Default)
Soujin

January 2012

S M T W T F S
12345 67
89101112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags